|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28235 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
rhyddid
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 05 10:37 pm Post subject: Re: Bottles or barrels? |
|
Treacodactyl wrote: |
For Christmas I made a 4 gallon batch of beer from just malt (liquid and crystal grains), hops, water and yeast. I followed my own recipe. I bottled half in mostly plastic bottles and put the rest in a handy 2 gallon beer barrel.
Although it didn't fully clear and was a tad too bitter if produced a very drinkable winter ale.
There was a noticeable difference between the bottles and barrel with the barrel beer tasting much better. The barrel is also much easier to use but it's not good to have 16 pints to get through in a week.
What do other beer brewers use and do you have a preference? |
I use kegs, casks, and glass bottles.
None of this equipment was obtained from homebrew shops. Most homebrew shop equipment is <opinion>toy-town stuff</opinion>.
Each storage method has it's own merits.
Bottles are time-consuming to prepare, but once the beer is in the bottle and properly carbonated it will keep for a long time. Also very portable. For that spontaneous barbeque.
Plastic PET bottles are useful, particularly if you use the 2 litre (4 pint) sizes. The only problem is that they do 'breathe'. I'm not sure what the technical term is, perhaps permeable. The quality of the brew will deteriorate over time.
Glass and plastic bottles cost nothing. You can of course pay for
them if you're not prepared to find them.
Kegs require the expense of the keg itself/gas/gas regulators/dispense equipment. And some skill. BUT kegs offer the most precise method of carbonating beer. Just to clarify,
by 'keg', I mean a real keg, as used by a brewery, not the
stuff you would pick up in a homebrew shop.
Casks (the type of things used for real ale) require a beer engine to pull the beer up from the cask. The cask require a small investment in bungs/keystones/shives. And some skill. No gas equipment required. Gas pressure provided by natural fermentation. Real ale tends to served flat (certainly, flat in comparison to the fizzy swill most people drink).
I prefer the cask method because it produces a beer with a superior and more complex flavour. As CAMRA would say, real ale is a living product. I believe the cask accentuates the true flavour of good beer.
Good luck with your brewing ! |
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28235 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
rhyddid
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 228
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28235 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Gertie
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1638 Location: Yorkshire
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28235 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Fiddlesticks
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 10460
|
|
|
|
|
rhyddid
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 228
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
|