|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
oldish chris
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 4148 Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15970
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 13 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
Mistress Rose wrote: |
The land is of course an expensive part of the price of a house, but wouldn't it be far better to ensure that all future development was of 'affordable' or rent/sale places so that young people could get on the property ladder if they want to? We keep getting 'executive' or 'stunning' developments round here, very few of which are affordable by youngsters.
Perhaps someone who has had to take out a student loan can tell me. If you go for a mortgage, is the student loan taken into account, giving you less chance of the mortgage? |
What's more, a couple of years after being built they start falling apart... I think giving away land is the wrong way to go about it, but at least the issue is being raised, rather than ignored as it has been for some time now.
We've had some 'affordable' homes built a couple of villages away - they look like council houses, only smaller, and I'll be interested to see whether they turn out to be in any way 'affordable'. Some tweaking of the planning system would be a better way to make self-building more affordable, but there's so much opposition that I don't see it being done in the short term. |
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
oldish chris
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 4148 Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
|
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 13 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
Worth remembering, with a typical speculative urban "new build" the breakdown of the asking price is 30% cost of land, 30% cost of construction, 30% profit.
If a "not for profit" organisation could build on land that was not designated "development land" then a house could built at around half the normal price.
As we saw with the "right to buy" legislation, after a few years, the property is sold on to a "buy to let" investor, who then charges the maximum rent that the market allows, which in turn means that the benefits bill goes sky high.
Therefore such a house would have to have loads of conditions attached to the sale, similar to houses built for agricultural workers.
Personally, I'd re-invent council housing. |
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
oldish chris
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 4148 Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15970
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
onemanband
Joined: 26 Dec 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: NCA90
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
|