|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
ksia
Joined: 17 May 2006 Posts: 2320 Location: Mayenne, France
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28246 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
resistance is fertile
Joined: 24 Oct 2008 Posts: 1534 Location: The heart of North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Silas
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6848 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 09 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
Silas wrote: |
Do you think us as 9/10 year olds knew what it was a substitution for - of course we did, and as a consequence half the people in the playground became 'Mucking Idiots'. So I think bunging and asterix (sp?) instead of a vowel does not really achieve much. |
I want to agree, but, strangely, when it comes down to it we're not talking about whether people understand what you're saying, we're talking about whether people are offended by it. And while it seems senseless, fewer people seem offended by $h1t than by the real word.
In a more rational world you'd be right. But it ain't a rational world, if it was the very idea of particular words that carry a special offensiveness unrelated to what they actually mean would be considered a bizarre anachronism.
But here we come back to the same basic issue; there is not a defined view of what is or is not offensive. We don't have a general consensus, at least not one that would stand up to the slightest bit of scrutiny.
How this relates to what a forum is for... Well, I'm not sure it does. I'm unclear as to what the 'chat' forum is for; the others make a kind of sense. |
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Green Rosie
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 10498 Location: Calvados, France
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|