|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
jamanda Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 35057 Location: Devon
|
|
|
|
|
bibbster
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 1233 Location: Just a bit inland from Aberaeron
|
|
|
|
|
pookie
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 4984 Location: Mid-Wales
|
|
|
|
|
jamanda Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 35057 Location: Devon
|
|
|
|
|
mochyn
Joined: 21 Dec 2004 Posts: 24585 Location: mid-Wales
|
|
|
|
|
chez
Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 35935 Location: The Hive of the Uberbee, Quantock Hills, Somerset
|
|
|
|
|
Chickem
Joined: 27 Mar 2009 Posts: 3958 Location: Sunny Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Mr O
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 5512 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
Gervase
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 8655
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 10 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
TBH, 65 is probably more than the number of active regular posters over the past week, so in that sense it is representative. As in real life, if people don't vote, then they can't really grumble about the result of an election. After all, would you be happy if fewer than 50 per cent of the populatilon voted for a change of government, but because the unsung majority didn't express a preference, the government remained the same?
ETA: That said, polls regarding the site itself used to be time specific, whereas the new one is vague. This issue of moving avatars doesn't really register on my flying-fartometer, though, so I have no real views on the poll. |
|
|
|
|
Mr O
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 5512 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 10 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
Gervase wrote: |
TBH, 65 is probably more than the number of active regular posters over the past week, so in that sense it is representative. As in real life, if people don't vote, then they can't really grumble about the result of an election. After all, would you be happy if fewer than 50 per cent of the populatilon voted for a change of government, but because the unsung majority didn't express a preference, the government remained the same?
ETA: That said, polls regarding the site itself used to be time specific, whereas the new one is vague. This issue of moving avatars doesn't really register on my flying-fartometer, though, so I have no real views on the poll. |
Wording is equally important. A poll should simply say " If you object to moving Avatars Vote here " those that don't care need not even vote, which is the fairest way I feel. Otherwise we give an over credence to those that do object.
The way it is at the moment, it seems like if you complain, then you get your way, cos no one else is really bothered. |
|
|
|
|
marigold
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 12458 Location: West Sussex
|
|
|
|
|
Mr O
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 5512 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
Marionb
Joined: 27 Aug 2006 Posts: 5267 Location: Mid-Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Mr O
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 5512 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
toggle
Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 11622 Location: truro
|
|
|
|
|
|