|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
thos
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 1139 Location: Jauche, Duchy of Brabant (Bourgogne-ci) and Charolles, Duchy of Burgundy (Bourgogne-�a)
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
High Green Farm
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 349 Location: Mid-Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
tawny owl
Joined: 29 Apr 2005 Posts: 563 Location: Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 05 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
dougal wrote: |
Thos is perfectly correct that the current *investment* value of the freehold to any other buyer is only likely to be �100 or so.
However its value to you, Sally, is going to be higher, and that is going to be well-known to the freeholder. |
And it includes the conveyancing costs, which would probably be a couple of hundred anyway, solicitors being the expensive little devils that they are. In all honesty, you're going to end up owning your house outright for the cost of a fortnight's package holiday. I'd say grab it, but as others have said, see if you can get a few quid off, and get them to do the Land Registry transfer for you as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|