Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Examples of farming without animals
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Land Management
Author 
 Message
cassy



Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1047
Location: South West Scotland
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 11 8:58 am    Post subject: Examples of farming without animals Reply with quote
    

Someone recently asked if anyone could cite successful examples of farming without animals or off-farm inputs. There is an article in the latest Agroforestry Research Trust newsletter about Wakelyns Agroforestry, where the Farm Woodlands Forum held their annual meeting this year.

Wakelyns Agroforestry
Farm Woodlands Forum

Some interesting points were slowing the spread of potato blight; using genetically diverse seed and the final paragraph of the farm visit discussing yields.

Another newly set up silvopastoral farm, which is part of the same trials is Whitehall Farm, but as it's newly established there is obviously no info available on yields yet.

I think mixed agroforestry systems will always be are more flexible in terms of the land they can make use of esp. where machine use is not practical, but thought might be of interest to other people.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 11 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

That was interesting, thanks. They've come up against the same problem as most organic systems though;

Quote:
At Wakelyns, we use no inputs at all (except for tractor diesel)


The only way I can see around that is using human or animal power, or some form of non-animal renewable energy source to replace the diesel - more biodigesting of human sewage, perhaps?

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 11 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Assuming that produce will leave a farm usually, is it reasonable to expect zero inputs?

cassy



Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1047
Location: South West Scotland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 11 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rob R wrote:
That was interesting, thanks. They've come up against the same problem as most organic systems though;

Quote:
At Wakelyns, we use no inputs at all (except for tractor diesel)


The only way I can see around that is using human or animal power, or some form of non-animal renewable energy source to replace the diesel - more biodigesting of human sewage, perhaps?


Yep, it will never work properly unless there is a mass return to people working the land, living close to where their food is produced and closing the cycle by using all that wasted fertility.

Do you think it will ever happen?

oldish chris



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 4148
Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 11 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cassy wrote:
Rob R wrote:
That was interesting, thanks. They've come up against the same problem as most organic systems though;

Quote:
At Wakelyns, we use no inputs at all (except for tractor diesel)


The only way I can see around that is using human or animal power, or some form of non-animal renewable energy source to replace the diesel - more biodigesting of human sewage, perhaps?


Yep, it will never work properly unless there is a mass return to people working the land, living close to where their food is produced and closing the cycle by using all that wasted fertility.

Do you think it will ever happen?
It is happening - in Cuba, google words like "Cuban agriculture" and "organoponico". Agriculture is a modern technical commercial industry, driven by costs and profit. As costs (selling and buying) change, agricultural practices change.

Worth noting that Victorian science was simple: fertilisers such as ammonium nitrate and insecticides such as lead arsenate. We are now in an era of ecology, much more complex and leading to much less damaging agricultural methods.

judith



Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22789
Location: Montgomeryshire
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 11 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Night soil always used to be collected from the cities for spreading on the fields in outlying areas. At some point we became a little squeamish about the idea.

cassy



Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1047
Location: South West Scotland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 11 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

oldish chris wrote:
It is happening - in Cuba ...

Yes, but that has been driven by some fairly extreme circumstances that we do not have to contend with in this country at present. Agriculture/horticulture in Cuban cities is an excellent example of closing the distance between producers and consumers but I'm not sure that's going to happen in this country without some cataclysmic event/s.

Because of that, I think although the agroforestry systems under discussion are not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, they are a step in the right direction and research into alternatives has got to be a good thing.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 11 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cassy wrote:
Rob R wrote:
That was interesting, thanks. They've come up against the same problem as most organic systems though;

Quote:
At Wakelyns, we use no inputs at all (except for tractor diesel)


The only way I can see around that is using human or animal power, or some form of non-animal renewable energy source to replace the diesel - more biodigesting of human sewage, perhaps?


Yep, it will never work properly unless there is a mass return to people working the land, living close to where their food is produced and closing the cycle by using all that wasted fertility.

Do you think it will ever happen?


In short, no, with the effort required to produce food at commercial levels and market price it will always be left it to other sources of energy and/or animal farming - managing the land is so much easier that way. In times of hardship, following extreme events as we sometimes see in other countries, would also see animals favoured over crops. Animals are portable, whereas crops have to stay in one place for months or years and are therefore more vulnerable.

There is every chance it could happen though, in the hands of the trully dedicated, but even there I see mixed farming as being more likely, to cover all bases.

Shane



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 3467
Location: Doha. Is hot.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 11 5:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

judith wrote:
Night soil always used to be collected from the cities for spreading on the fields in outlying areas. At some point we became a little squeamish about the idea.
It's unacceptable from a religious point of view in some of the world, too (i.e. here). Doesn't bother me, though, I have to say.

oldish chris



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 4148
Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 11 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Shane wrote:
judith wrote:
Night soil always used to be collected from the cities for spreading on the fields in outlying areas. At some point we became a little squeamish about the idea.
It's unacceptable from a religious point of view in some of the world, too (i.e. here). Doesn't bother me, though, I have to say.
Religious reasons? Here? Pretty sure that the decline in the use of night soil coincided with the decline in religious observance. The use of night soil declined for reasons of national health - the sewer system was developed to deal with human excreta. The loss of a fertiliser was replaced with nice clean chemicals manufactured using the Haber-Bosch process.

Shane



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 3467
Location: Doha. Is hot.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 11 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Your here is different to mine

This came up in a discussion with a water treatment vendor I was talking to a while back. They have some impressive reedbed technology that takes industrial scale waste water and turns it into fresh water suitable for use in irrigation. I asked why they don't use it to treat all the sewage that the region produces and was told that it's unacceptable round here to use anything derived from human waste on crops. Hopefully the learned sages in Saudi that recently discovered a previously-unknown passage in the Quran banning public protests will discover some text okaying the use of number ones and number twos in agriculture when the fresh water runs out over here.

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45669
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 11 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Shane wrote:
Hopefully the learned sages in Saudi that recently discovered a previously-unknown passage in the Quran banning public protests will discover some text okaying the use of number ones and number twos in agriculture when the fresh water runs out over here.




No problems using number 1s or 2s in Pakistan

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46211
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 11 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

pre columbian forest gardening in amazonia made salad ,fruit and carbs ,

an allotment can do the same

protien is an issue with no animals

shadiya



Joined: 02 Feb 2008
Posts: 1285

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 11 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cassy wrote:
oldish chris wrote:
It is happening - in Cuba ...

Yes, but that has been driven by some fairly extreme circumstances that we do not have to contend with in this country at present. Agriculture/horticulture in Cuban cities is an excellent example of closing the distance between producers and consumers but I'm not sure that's going to happen in this country without some cataclysmic event/s.

Because of that, I think although the agroforestry systems under discussion are not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, they are a step in the right direction and research into alternatives has got to be a good thing.


I hate to be the voice of doom and gloom but the Cuban example is no longer the beacon of hope that it was. With Chavez telling the US to take a hike,( which is a good thing), Cuba got access to oil again and seem to have ditched their organic growing in favour of the easy option, (which is not). We mustn't forget that pre collaps, they had an industrial agriculture, much like we have over here, courtesy of Soviet oil.

So it's a good example of what can be done when the chips are down but only because Castro, whatever you think of him, is pretty much a benevolent dictator. By that I mean that he does actually have the concerns of his people at heart, so after the collapse of the Soviet Union, a food allowance for everyone was introduced, much like rationing during the war. It meant that while people may have lost a bit of weight, they survived. The status of farmers was also raised as people finally (hallelujah!) worked out how important it was that someone grew food, rather than getting a proper job in advertising or marketing or whatever!

Despite being veggie, I like having animals on the farm. However, take a look at what my friend Tolly is up to, stockless farming is perfectly doable and efficient https://www.tolhurstorganic.co.uk

Their carbon footprint for the business, which supplies approx 120 tonnes of veg a year direct to people, works out at 8 tonnes, slightly more than the average household.

Shane



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 3467
Location: Doha. Is hot.
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 11 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

In my opinion (and experience), dictators are only as benevolent as they need to be to prevent mass revolution.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Land Management All times are GMT
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com