Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Self sufficiency, how much land???
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Finance and Property
Author 
 Message
tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Judith wrote:
tahir wrote:
millet


Where is this farm?


British Isles (anywhere) I'm just saying that wheat's not our only option.

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
Wheat is not essential, when my mum and dad had to leave India they weren't able to harvest enough wheat to eat for at least a couple of years, survived on maize, millet and some other grains that I have no idea of the English names of.


Probably looking at the land requirements in "3rd world countries" would be a good way of going, though it might be difficult finding a suitable example with a similar maritime climate to ours. Or, more sensibly, back in the middle ages, how much land did you have (as a serf),


Peter.

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
British Isles (anywhere) I'm just saying that wheat's not our only option.


But are you implying that it's not the best option. I'm certainly interested in trying amaranths. I think that hemp also has a lot going for it,


Peter.

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

What I'm saying is that modern wheat yields are so high because of the inputs they require, a lot of these other crops are much easier to look after and have more than one use.

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
What I'm saying is that modern wheat yields are so high because of the inputs they require, a lot of these other crops are much easier to look after and have more than one use.


Agreed. Though presumably there's something about wheat. It's had a very long history and is very popular in very many parts of the world,


Peter.

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Blue Peter wrote:
Agreed. Though presumably there's something about wheat. It's had a very long history and is very popular in very many parts of the world,


High gluten levels?

judith



Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22789
Location: Montgomeryshire
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I went for wheat because I thought it would be most productive and versatile. I would probably add barley and fields beans if I had to feed chooks and pigs. Problem is that I have no idea about yields.
I would still argue, though, that every additional crop will increase the amount of land required compared to monoculture, and it will certainly increase the time and effort required so our family still need to make some hard choices about what they are going to grow!

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
Blue Peter wrote:
Agreed. Though presumably there's something about wheat. It's had a very long history and is very popular in very many parts of the world,


High gluten levels?


I was wondering that. Is it the only thing you can make a "proper" leavened loaf of bread from?


Peter.

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Judith wrote:

I would still argue, though, that every additional crop will increase the amount of land required compared to monoculture, and it will certainly increase the time and effort required so our family still need to make some hard choices about what they are going to grow!


How do things stack up if you have a community, though? Is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?


Peter.

Last edited by Blue Peter on Thu Sep 08, 05 4:00 pm; edited 1 time in total

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Blue Peter wrote:
How do things stack up if you have a community, though/ Is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?


Things get exponentially better, it doesn't take much more fuel to bake 20 loaves of bread than one etc.

Specialisation within communities definitely has a lot of advantages, I suppose that's why we're social animals.

judith



Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22789
Location: Montgomeryshire
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Sounds as though you have talked yourself out of this self-sufficiency idea

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Judith wrote:
Sounds as though you have talked yourself out of this self-sufficiency idea


I've no ambition to be self sufficient, except perhaps in chicken and eggs, it's just one of those questions that people often ask

judith



Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 22789
Location: Montgomeryshire
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I think the answer to the question is that you can't - people never have been since they moved on from the hunter-gatherer life.

Blue Peter



Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
Judith wrote:
Sounds as though you have talked yourself out of this self-sufficiency idea


I've no ambition to be self sufficient, except perhaps in chicken and eggs, it's just one of those questions that people often ask







Peter.

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 05 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Judith wrote:
I think the answer to the question is that you can't - people never have been since they moved on from the hunter-gatherer life.


You're probably right, when my mum and dad were subsistence farmers a lot of what they did was communal, it just couldn't have been done any other way. It'd still be interesting to know how small a community (in how much land) could realistically be self sufficient.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Finance and Property All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com