|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 16004
|
|
|
|
|
Falstaff
Joined: 27 May 2009 Posts: 1014
|
|
|
|
|
onemanband
Joined: 26 Dec 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: NCA90
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 15 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
onemanband wrote: |
@ Falstaff.... nor a radio, gps, a roof, lights etc
I'm no farmer or scientist, but I'm wondering if an analogy can be made to the study into using hamsters to generate electricity......that is, the study came to the conclusion that it is more efficient to burn the hamster food to generate electricity, than to have hamsters running in a dynamo wheel.
A lot of energy must be lost propelling 140kg of tractor along.
I wonder, all things considered, whether a traditional wheel hoe is more effective and efficient.
On a similar theme........bicycle wheel hoe |
A traditional wheel hoe is more effective IMHO, able to tackle more established weeds but slower & harder on the upper body. I've hoed an acre of fodder beet with a wheel hoe & it hurt. Give me the sit on my ass & pedal hoe anyday.
Does a pedalhoe float? |
|
|
|
|
Slim
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 6614 Location: New England (In the US of A)
|
|
|
|
|
gregotyn
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 2201 Location: Llanfyllin area
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 16004
|
|
|
|
|
|