|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4613 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Slim
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 6612 Location: New England (In the US of A)
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 21 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
I'm not going to criticise your decision Roobarb; that is up to you, but I have a feeling, perhaps ill founded, that particulates are the 'in thing' at the moment as we haven't been able to trace them in the human body until recently. We have also been living with fire for thousands of years, apparently with few ill effects. I would also point out that there are fewer particulates given off if a fire is going constantly than if the chimney gets cold and is used less frequently.
Slim, I am sure our winter temperatures are nothing like as low as yours, but ours is a damp cold. At present the night temperature here is about 5 deg C, so not cold at all by your standards, but it is damp if not raining, and with some wind chill.
We tend to heat our house in the same way. We have the fire going all the time, low during the day when we are not there, and no central heating, but all the doors are open, so any hot air goes round the house. At night, unless it is very cold, we shut the bedroom door to keep the room cooler. The central heating thermostat is in the study with various computer bits running, so it tends to be more of a secondary heating in some ways as it is set fairly low and in a room heated to some extent. |
|
|
|
|
|