|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
bernie-woman
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 7824 Location: shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
Bernie66
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 13967 Location: Eastoft
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
bernie-woman
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 7824 Location: shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23956 Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
bernie-woman
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 7824 Location: shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46216 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Gervase
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 8655
|
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 06 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
There shouldn't be a huge discrepancy between quotes, as the formulae are pretty common - most of them use Griffith's for pricing, which breaks down every aspect of work into a cost to which a regional multiplier is applied, and if that fails there's a standard, idealised sum per square metre of work.
However you do get variations in quotes because... because some builders are better than others and can charge more; because some are faster and therefore can charge less; because some have higher overheads (more vehicles, plant and staff); because some look at the client and try to guess how much they can get away with or because some are naive and don't charge nearly enough for their work (and yes, they do exist - I know a couple of superb builders who have been routinely charging half what they could and should charge and have been nagging them to 'get real'). There are also builders who estimate conservatively, factoring in any number of contingencies so that they seem expensive but usually deliver under budget, and there are others who will pitch in with a low estimate and then horrify you with all sorts of add-ons.
So there's really nothing unusal about big discrepancies in tenders. Any reputable builder should be able to give you references, though. Ask them what other projects they've done and for the phone numbers of the clients. Talk to the clients and tell them what you're doing - would they recommend the guys? Never appoint anyone without knowing what their work is like and whether they give value for money.
And, as dpack says, get fixed price quotes and write in time penalties - one of the commonest gripes, particularly with smaller jobs, is that the builders keep buggering off to do more lucrative work, leaving your job unfinished. A penalty clause will help prevent that.
A schedule of works is vital - and for everyone's sake, make sure you stick to it. There's nothing worse for a builder than a client who keeps changing his or her mind and ammending the plans. It also annoys the building inspector and can end up costing you more in time and money, so have a clear picture of what you want before you start.
As for paying the builders, a fair formula is one third when the agreement is signed, one third when the building inspector has approved the works on a second visit and the final third on completion. There are all sorts of variations to this, however, so be prepared to be flexible. Many builders, though, will want a 'draw' during the work, particularly if it goes on for some time. A couple of grand a month would be normal, if the work is progressing well.
And keep communication channels open - talk to the guys about what they're doing and listen to their advice. Good builders know more about building than you do, and probably more than your architect, so their advice can be timely and cost-effective. |
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46216 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|