|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42219 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Trev
Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 69 Location: Wokingham DC, Berkshire
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 05 3:06 pm Post subject: Re: Radiator thermostats... |
|
sean wrote: |
Our central heating has thermostats on the radiators, which is good, but they're crap which is bad. Effectively the temp adjustment on them doesn't work so they're either on or off.
How difficult is it to change them, and has anyone any recommendations on makes/models? |
I'm assuming that they are reasonably recent devices.
In which case, they probably *do* work, just very s_l_o_w_l_y. They are very, very unresponsive, but they do work. And its very difficult to detect/monitor exactly what the valve is actually doing - the best you can do is check the radiator temperature - at the *outflow* (not the top!)
The idea is that they are a thermostat ie they maintain a static temperature in the room. They are *not* thermometers or "controllers" which might try and achieve a particular set temperature.
They are trying to maintain the head-level temperature (for comfort) by trying to keep the ankle-level temperature constant-ish. Which is dependent on the air movement in that room. (And different rooms have different vertical temperature gradients...)
They really are *not* items to be readjusted daily, after their initial setting.
I'd suggest that it'd be pretty difficult to find a reasonable set point at this time of year.
When it gets cool enough to need the heating on, you can tweak each one a little (10% of the range?) and then consider whether the room is too hot or cold - but only an hour or more after you tweaked it...
And once you have a happy medium - leave it alone! The idea is that *you* do *not* have to "turn it up a bit" on a cold day...
If the outflow temperature never varies, and is pretty cool, thats an indication that the lockshield (balance) valve is closed too much. In fact, with stats, the function of balancing is only to make the initial warming up process happen evenly (not to balance the steady-state heat around the house).
Thermostat detail points. Some can deal with water flowing one way only. Bi-directional ones give more mounting flexibility - IMHO its a good idea to mount the head horizontally, so its further away from the rad.
Its considered bad practice to have more than one thermostatic valve in the same room. It should be on the biggest radiator. (You can just set the t-valve on the others to maximum, no need to remove them.)
For the same size pipe, they should be fairly interchangeable, as far as size goes. It'll be a drain down job to change the valves, and you'd need to tighten the joints to prevent leakage on refilling the system. Non-trivial, but not highly skilled.
I don't think there's much difference between brands on their *control* capabilities. Some might say there were differences in *durability* (they used to have a terrible reputation for sticking - original Danfoss ones particularly.) And they are pretty cheap.
There are odd *electrical* (rather than pure mechanical expansion/contraction) controls, which can have a remote room temperature controller, or even be remotely computer controlled and monitored, , but these are naturally *very* much more expensive... |
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 05 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
So they can't mantain different heating 'zones' in a house, then? We have difficutly, as we have a loft conversion, which is still cold, when the rest of house is far too warm, and if we put the thermostat up there (its a remote one) its warm enough, when everywhere else is far too hot, and the heating is still on when the woodburner is doing it job! As I only really want a warm bedroom in the morning, we are using a heated towel rail, on a timer plug at the moment, but himself is talking about a two zone system to maintain the temperature with two thermostats, - one for the bedroom and one for the rest of the house - would thermostatic rad valves work instead? |
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 05 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
wellington womble wrote: |
So they can't mantain different heating 'zones' in a house, then? |
Yes they can, if the doors are closed! That's why they are effectively required by the current regs.
Quote: |
We have difficutly, as we have a loft conversion, which is still cold, when the rest of house is far too warm, and if we put the thermostat up there (its a remote one) its warm enough, when everywhere else is far too hot, |
Room stats are a different matter to rad stats...
It sounds like your loft conversion needs a bigger radiator and/or better insulation! (Maybe only the lockshield valve opened a bit, - or others closed down a bit)
I didn't mention that you can muck up the control scheme by having a room stat in a room with a rad stat...
As you have discovered, once the room-stat-room is hot enough, heat is switched *off* for the whole house...
Wireless room stats are very kewl, but they are better seen as avoiding difficult/unsightly wires, rather than portable comfort control...!!!
Quote: |
As I only really want a warm bedroom in the morning, ... himself is talking about a two zone system to maintain the temperature with two thermostats, - one for the bedroom and one for the rest of the house - would thermostatic rad valves work instead? |
If you have the potential to install zoned pipework, that would clearly be a better solution - you could, with a second timer, avoid heating the bedroom(s) during daytime, even if you are at home... however, rad stats in the bedrooms would provide individual room temperature moderation - probably better than a bedroom room stat.
I'd expect (dunno what you've got) that the easy way to do it would be to use a motorised valve to switch off the bedrooms (ie don't bother arranging it so the bedrooms could be heated without heating the living rooms.) |
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Trev
Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 69 Location: Wokingham DC, Berkshire
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23956 Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
Northern_Lad
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 14210 Location: Somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|