|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Bodger
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 13524
|
|
|
|
|
DorsetScott
Joined: 23 Oct 2011 Posts: 500 Location: Bournemouth
|
|
|
|
|
Barefoot Andrew Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2007 Posts: 22780 Location: In the 17th century
|
|
|
|
|
DorsetScott
Joined: 23 Oct 2011 Posts: 500 Location: Bournemouth
|
|
|
|
|
Barefoot Andrew Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2007 Posts: 22780 Location: In the 17th century
|
|
|
|
|
Sam White
Joined: 30 Aug 2013 Posts: 17 Location: On a hillside near Caerphilly.
|
|
|
|
|
arvo
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 3321 Location: Somerset
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Sam White
Joined: 30 Aug 2013 Posts: 17 Location: On a hillside near Caerphilly.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Piggyphile
Joined: 02 Apr 2009 Posts: 891 Location: Galicia
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Posts: 15425 Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 13 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
Rob R wrote: |
But what's your baseline for a non-growth economy? I'm assuming that'd basically be a stable population... |
Oh, now there is an interesting point.
If you have a stable economy and a growing population, then on average, each person is getting less...
OTOH, if there are more people, there are more people to produce things or to add value. The trick, perhaps is to match economic growth to population growth.
Meanwhile, back in real world land, it really doesn't matter a damn, just as long as the people at the top keep shafting the people at the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
|