Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Car makers blocking green fuels

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment
Author 
 Message
Behemoth



Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 19023
Location: Leeds
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 06 3:12 pm    Post subject: Car makers blocking green fuels Reply with quote
    

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4651562.stm

dougal



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 06 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Catchy headline.

Shame the article doesn't actually say the same thing as its headline.
There is *nothing* in the article whatsoever about any manufacturer *blocking* 'green' fuels.


The Prof wants to see work done on Hydrogen powered vehicles. (Sounds like that's his thing...)

I want to know where he thinks the electricity to generate the Hydrogen fuel is going to come from. And it does need electricity to produce it. Which means an increase in electricity demand and therefore generation.
Hydrogen is only as 'green' as the electricity used to produce it.
And heaven knows, its tough enough meeting a significant proportion of *current* electricity demand from renewables without adding to the demand...
Is the Prof really asking for lots and lots of nukes?

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 06 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

But his point has some validity, where is the european equivalent of the Insight or Prius?

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45672
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 06 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Audi will have hybrid vehicles on the market in 2007, surprised MB haven't they've been researching them longer than almost anyone (and actually produce fuel cell buses)

dougal



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 06 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Jonnyboy wrote:
But his point has some validity, where is the european equivalent of the Insight or Prius?

The Insight is an oddity. I researched the heck out of it and nearly bought one. Its an engineering jewel. (Accounting in large part for its high insurance group.) BUT its actually not a very good hybrid. Disable the IMA and it returns, near as dammit, the same fuel usage - although with lower performance.
The Mk2 Prius is a rather better hybrid. It makes more use of the electric motors (although it does actually *depend* on them to move at all - such is the nature of the CVT transmission that blends petrol and electric) and it looks after its batteries better.
Which is why no one remembers the Honda Civic Hybrid. It ain't as good as the Mk2 Prius. (And I'm a Honda believer.)

Unfortunately, these are very expensive vehicles. For what they offer - including their 'green' credentials.

Compare the Prius with the Audi A2 diesel. The Audi has better fuel economy, and very very nearly as good CO2 emissions. It costs less than 2/3 of the Prius price - and you don't get a Government Grant to persuade you to buy one. It offers almost as much interior space, while taking up much less road space - and yet it doesn't qualify for congestion charge exemption (�10/year instead of nearly that much per day) like the Prius...
My guess is that you could reasonably expect to get 300,000 miles out of an A2 diesel. (Its never going to rust, and that diesel is long-lived.) Does anyone expect to see 300,000 on their Prius?
Oh yeah and Prof... which one will run, today, unmodified and manufacturer approved on 100% Biofuel? Yes, its the Audi...

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 06 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Yes Dougal, the A2 is particularly efficient, and the particulate emissions are excellent for a diesel. In fact, all of the VAG diesel engines are excellent performers, if a little noisy.

The benefit of the Honda & Toyota offerings is that they are showcasing new technology and a change in emphasis as to what we should expect from our future vehicles, whereas many of the major manufacturers are stuck in the bigger/faster/more toys minds set.

dougal



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 06 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

My objection is to the completely misleading BBC headline.

But before dealing with that, I think it worth commenting, in general rather than specific terms on the issue Jonnyboy has raised.

Petrol/electric hybrids are an **efficiency** technology. Not a fuel technology. All the energy originates from the petrol. Energy that would be dumped to waste when braking is captured into batteries and reused on subsequent acceleration.
That is *one* aspect of efficiency. And it is *the* aspect that Toyota have focussed on. And are currently capitalising on by using the technology to 'greenwash' their big Lexus 4x4's and licensing the technology to Ford in the USA for use on their big 4x4's.

European manufacturers have focussed on *different* efficiency technologies. They have developed mass production engines to efficiencies generally rather better than the Japanese. They have adopted lighter construction methods without sacrificing crash safety. And they have produced many brilliant designs to maximise the useful interior space while minimising the exterior vehicle size - and, the tricky bit, wrapping that interior in a wrapping that is both aerodynamically efficient and appealing. I'd also suggest that making a vehicle have a longer life is a more efficient use of the resources invested in its construction.

The Prius doesn't have a particularly efficient petrol engine, large interior in a small exterior, or aerodynamics to rival such as the A2.

There is no reason that multiple advanced technologies shouldn't be combined.
The A2 demonstrates that these technologies can produce equivalent efficiency to the 50% more expensive Prius.

Hybrid tech can give an excellent efficiency improvement. But it does NOT of itself make a 'green' vehicle - which is my objection to hybrid SUVs. The great american public still want bigger/faster/more toys, but are being offered 'hybrid' to make bigger/faster/etc OK and green. It ain't. Folk need to be steered towards smaller, longer lasting, truly efficient vehicles, errr, like the A2, the Citroen C1, Fiat Panda... not Lexus hybrid 4x4's.

As a technology, hybrid is particularly suited to stop/start driving. But its usefulness is currently limited by the maximum rate at which the batteries can be charged (it can't recover much energy from 'sharp' braking). This will change in the next few years with 'nanotech' batteries - and then the hybrid concept should get much more application.


As regards the BBC article headline about manufacturers and 'green' fuels - the only green road transport fuels for the planning future (I regard 'foreseeable future', as an oxymoron) are Biofuels. Without any need for developing new technology, and at very little extra cost, petrol engine manufacturers could be producing alcohol-ready products. Virtually all todays diesels are fine for Biodiesel, but many manufacturers - notably the Japanese - are reluctant to certify them as such.

Hydrogen is not a true 'fuel' as an energy *source*. It is *very* like a battery - an energy store. And how 'clean' or 'green' Hydrogen might be depends entirely on the source of the energy to produce the Hydrogen.

I regret to say that the Prof's appeal for government funding of his researches could have been made in a much less gratuitously offensive manner - and could have been better reported by the BBC.

puffedpride



Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 300
Location: bristol
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 06 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

All this is interesting - not that I'm in a position to buy any of these cars. A work colleague has a Prius of which he is very proud!

I didn't even know that the Audi A2 had 'green' credentials.

However, if it is made out of that much aluminium, will it not have a sky high ecological footprint from the manufacture? I know aluminium is the queen of recyclable metals, but its extraction from source is one of the most environmentally damaging activities there is! I wonder how much of an A2 is from recycled aluminium?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46220
Location: yes
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 06 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

the only green car is a henhouse .

dougal



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 06 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

puffedpride wrote:
... I wonder how much of an A2 is from recycled aluminium?

Well, with a vague memory of statements on the VW/Audi websites about using quite a lot of recycled materials, I went to look.

And the A2 is no longer on the Audi site... its 'phased out' already in preparation for a replacement model due later this year.

Because Aluminium is *so* recyclable, there's hardly an issue using recycled material rather than virgin. Its not quite like paper or plastic where a mishmash of returned stuff is clearly different to a 'pure' material.

IMHO its better to use Aluminium for light, fuel-efficient, long life non-corroding cars than soft drink and take away food packaging

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 06 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Dougal, The only thing you appear to be forgetting is that the need for fuel efficient cars has been 'pulled' through by consumer demand since the 1970's. It's simply down to the cost of our fuel rather than the fact that Europeans are naturally more in tune with the environment than their stateside neighbours.

Audi's TV ad's focus mainly on the RS models, high performance and the general brand association. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen an ad for the A2. When I first drove the A2 it was a LHD at Millbrook as they had concentrated most of the resource on Europe.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com