Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Misleading promotions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects
Author 
 Message
OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 8:07 am    Post subject: Misleading promotions Reply with quote
    

In my role as an electrician I've seen a lot of people conned into buying so-called energy saving bulbs that are far from it

Take this Energy Saving Halogen on Amazon. These are touted as '30% Energy Saving Advance technology halogen bulb'.
They are saving 30% compared to 50watt Halogens but they are infact using 700% more energy than equivalent LEDs!

In fact Energy Saving Halogen is a bit of an oxymoron. You'll still see them advertised as such ('Low Energy', 'Energy Saving', etc) but now that you can get LEDs for most light fittings Halogens are no longer the low energy option.

If it doesn't say LED on the box then the odds are its not the lowest energy option. Look twice before you buy!

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Good rant, but I think you're preaching to the choir here: I'd expect everyone on board to be on board with that already...

OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Hairyloon wrote:
Good rant, but I think you're preaching to the choir here: I'd expect everyone on board to be on board with that already...


Its easy to get mislead though...

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Mis-led, surely?

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

OtleyLad wrote:
Hairyloon wrote:
Good rant, but I think you're preaching to the choir here: I'd expect everyone on board to be on board with that already...


Its easy to get mislead though...


It is. And perhaps worth a note to Trading Standards.

OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rob R wrote:
Mis-led, surely?


Damn! Wish I'd though of that headline!

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 15 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    


Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15982

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 15 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

It depends on how you view it Otley Lad. Compared to the 'old' light bulbs that you can no longer buy, it might save energy, but compared to LEDs it is worse. On the other hand, I have yet to find LED lights that I can cope with.

Treacodactyl
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 25795
Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 15 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

The desc looks fine to me, a 30% saving over a comparable bulb which LEDs aren't.

Personally I've only had limited experience of LED bulbs but find them better than CFLs but not the same as incandescent or hals.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com