Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
relaxing pollution enforcement, with fishy update
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment
Author 
 Message
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 24 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

O2and BOD(fermented water) are pence a go as wet chemistry

a pre loved HPLC and some consumables/standards is not daft money, per test it is not expensive

a lab could do pro bono for little more than the time involved, i could set up a garage lab for less than a few grand

npk ,O2, basic microbiology and a selection of likely organics is pretty easy to check in aquatic environmental samples

larger life forms needs little more than a net, sieves, waders and a microscope etc
this interweb thing will help with how to and why for the new to the game
basic analysis for common pollutants and probable "odd ones" is within well-informed citizen capacity
the historians can play context with old records etc
and so on

it would be better to have a well resourced big toothed official regulator with extensive monitoring and zero tolerance to polluters, that would make being clean the best option
we haven't at the mo, evidence and loud pointing from concerned citizens is a tactic that is legal and at the least troublesome to the polluter at best very troublesome for the polluter

after the event is too late, make polluting very expensive, financially and personally for company decision makers and for the shareholders, and difficult to do in secret or in full view with no chance of a meaningful rebuke which make it the most profitable option

 
gz



Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 8953
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 24 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Avon= afon ( Cymraeg) and abhainn (Gàidhlig) both have the "V" sound like f in of.
Wye also means water ..same root as Dwr and Uisge.

It is heartbreaking how the Thames has degenerated..my cycling club president in the 70s had the work achievement of getting salmon back in the river, and other fish...I doubt that they are there now

 
tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45676
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 24 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I hope Labour start the process of renationalising basic utilities.

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 24 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

best part of 50 yrs a river i know well has gone from cat 5 = dead in any good way, via cat 1 to 2= not pristine wilderness but a healthy ecosystem with a bottom to top food chain with heron, kingfisher, brown trout or grayling at the top depending on the oxygenation from the shape and flow and the local ecosystem

and back to cat 5 dead from a combo of unregulated chem peeps having "incidents", assorted one off "private" misdemeanours and systematic discharges as that is cheaper than providing the sewerage services in the contract they have with the citizens
=================================
other aquatic issues

re "well meaning" but not like that
2 mink* a mile did not help my well known river, but it was healthy enough to support them and retain a full range aquatic ecosystem, although that was not "natural" after 150 years of human challenges

if i ever find out who "liberated" 9000 of the fluffy monsters, they have a problem
during the last few years of mink farm licences and objections to the trade, i was part of the anti mink thing to ensure no fool turned any loose
the wpc trying to be "nice" while we all had lunch, was quite surprised that cute and fluffy was not on my agenda, no vermin by any means was not the reasoning she had been briefed for

not on my watch, those things are ok in the middle of arboreal wetland wilderness a long way away, anywhere else they are usually dangeroos vermin
hey ho, the pollution will kill their food, which should thin them out,
i should have got a few hats when i could

 
Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15996

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 24 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Mink are vicious things. Some people from the animal management course in the next building to the forestry course our son was on at college did work experience at a wildlife park where they had mink in a secure house. The house had two parts so the mink could be isolated in one part while the other was cleaned. They were warned to always make sure all the mink were isolated before opening as they would bite badly as soon as look at you. Letting mink out was an ecological disaster, and shows what damage well meaning but uninformed idiots can do.

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Thu Feb 29, 24 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

i would rather share trout and grayling and ignore the duck genocide than see a river that had been made almost clean an open sewer again

otters and beavers have no tolerance of mink, far less smelly and bitey as well

we are stuck with some mink, few might fit into the ecosystem many do not

its hat time if you know of any

 
Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15996

PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 24 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

No water near us, so no mink to the best of my knowledge.

Agree, we have gone backwards on pollution as well as other things.

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 24 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

wye

if they are improving matters why is the wye declining?

the motives of wwf quietly dropping that report and tesco sponsoring "cute" projects could be open to several interpretations, some less than charitable options are on the list

in other river news, the Test is almost entirely degraded, including some serious one off incidents as well as the SW systemic sewage discharges which include the Test but cover many rivers and beaches

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 24 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

the organizers are advising to wash yer face when there are straw boaters on the river

Last edited by dpack on Wed Mar 27, 24 2:48 am; edited 1 time in total

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 24 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

considering my advice to a random group of scouting canoeists exiting the local river was"time for tea, buns and broad spectrum antibiotics"

and

our local citizen scientists have found coliforms and worse in the river and in the flood mud, which is extensive from the river and also from becks, drains etc, neither a stroll with the mutt(see local vet anecdotes etc) nor water based activities are biologically "safe"

 
Slim



Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 6612
Location: New England (In the US of A)
PostPosted: Thu May 09, 24 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Betcha good money this is PFAS related: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c043yl5vn0ro

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri May 10, 24 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

it does have the look of fire truck foam, could be a variety of stuff
, the aquatic wildlife will be seriously reduced whatever it was

the local obvious is multiple sewage facilities conducting discharges in several upstream catchments with towns and villages, at an informed guess the load is further forced by the other catchments that join this one before they mess up the sea

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 24 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

i floated neither lonely nor a cloud

 
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon May 20, 24 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

dante had some special plans for such folk

 
Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15996

PostPosted: Tue May 21, 24 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ofwat has made some bizarre decisions over the years. Our water supply has always come from a private company that hasn't been involved in all this mess and has always been pretty good. They planned to build a new reservoir in the 1960s and purchased the land ahead of what they saw as a lot of new houses in the area. Ofwat told them they couldn't build it until they had solved their leak problem, which isn't particularly bad, and is always dealt with promptly and well. The reservoir is finally being built now after several thousand houses have been built with several thousand more planned.

On the other hand, our sewage supplier hasn't had such a good record and has got involved in this mess. Selling shares and lumbering the company with debts seems to be the main problem and Ofwat haven't, as stated in the article, done much about that.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Page 11 of 11
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com