|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
mrsnesbitt
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1576
|
|
|
|
|
mrutty
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1578
|
|
|
|
|
mrutty
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1578
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 05 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
Got to agree with mrutty that the major problem is goalposts developing redshift when working with a client who is "learning"... (whatever the project)
But its really quite straightforward to build and link *simple* pages. Even to post pdf's of a carefully laid out brochure, or whatever, for download.
Many WP packages have a "save as HTML" option...
(As a Mac-person, I'm ruling myself out of explaining "how" to pc-people!)
Creation of a *very* simple website IS *very* simple...
Inevitably, you're going to want to enhance it with better graphics, pretty graphical buttons that show when the user rolls over them, clickable imagemaps, flash animations, pages built 'on the fly' from a live database - and maybe even online financial transactions (but that is a LONG way from the simplest site).
However, I'd love to see a cogent explanation of "hosting" packages - domain hosting, webspace hosting - or even, if you have a 24/7 connection, whether running your own server (a used Cobalt Qube2 is about �100 on eBay, or a new Mac mini is �339 inc vat, full unix OS, Apache webserver, one-click firewall, etc - it draws less than 40w and is TINY) makes any sense (and what else is needed - a secondary DNS server?)
And then there's search engine lore... |
|
|
|
|
mrsnesbitt
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1576
|
|
|
|
|
mrutty
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1578
|
|
|
|
|
alison Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 12918 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
mrutty
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1578
|
|
|
|
|
mrsnesbitt
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1576
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 05 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
For me one of the major issues is the upgrade path. It can be all very well thinking that someone who wants to simply get on the web, just needs a few nicely created html pages, and maybe that is all tehy do need for now.
But I have seen some of the "reasonable" rates,, then charged if someone simply wants a few things changed It is not that the rates are a rip off, they are not, but the problem with static html pages is that they are just that, static unless changed by someone with some knowledge.
If the user then wants to go beyond a few pages, perhaps adding content of their own, they are then in a bit of a dead end.
As such I think for most people who may well expand what they do on the web, it makes sense to get a full fledged hosting package, which is afterall only �6 a month, and something like Mambo, that after the initial setup, is hopefully something they can be taught to manage themselves.
You will pay a bit more upfront for this, though possible not very much more, as modifying a mambo template to look good for someone is little different to doing an initial html page layout.
jema |
|
|
|
|
|