Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Alternative to AOL?
Page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> IT Matters
Author 
 Message
mrutty



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 1578

PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Twoscoops wrote:
What's wrong with AOL?

It's over priced shitte that is packaged to have minimal impact on their infrastructure. Designed to hide all useful components from the user and hide the true nature of the 'Net'. Not interested in the great interests of the 'Net' and fails to follow RFCs until forced by overwheming pressure from it's users.

Pauses for breath.....

but otherwise fine

my mother uses AOL and it takes most of my life fixing their upgrades

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

mrutty wrote:
It's over priced shitte that is packaged to have minimal impact on their infrastructure. Designed to hide all useful components from the user and hide the true nature of the 'Net'. Not interested in the great interests of the 'Net' and fails to follow RFCs until forced by overwheming pressure from it's users.


That's one way of putting it.

twoscoops



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 1924
Location: Warwickshire
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Righto.

jema
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 28237
Location: escaped from Swindon
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

mrutty wrote:
Twoscoops wrote:
What's wrong with AOL?

It's over priced shitte that is packaged to have minimal impact on their infrastructure. Designed to hide all useful components from the user and hide the true nature of the 'Net'. Not interested in the great interests of the 'Net' and fails to follow RFCs until forced by overwheming pressure from it's users.

Pauses for breath.....

but otherwise fine

my mother uses AOL and it takes most of my life fixing their upgrades


My FIL went AOL originally, I recall popping round to help him, and finding myself at a loss, because in the AOL package all the standard bits from the internet were renamed or otherise f*&*ed with, as AOL decided it had the right to impose its own totally non standard infrastructure.

I know this is unfair on people who have no reason to know any better when they choose AOL but AOL has always been known as "assholes on line" by techies.

jema

dougal



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 7184
Location: South Kent
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

For anyone used to 'proper' net access AOL is a pain. Quite a lot of things are done differently, or simply seem not to work.

BUT - I had understood that AOL was quite highly regarded for their family-friendly nannying censorship, and accordingly might be a good recommendation for kids...

I'm not an advocate of relying on on-line support for internet access problems (think about it!)

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

And then there's the issue of the billions of AOL Cd's filling up landfill worldwide

mrutty



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 1578

PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

dougal wrote:
For anyone used to 'proper' net access AOL is a pain. Quite a lot of things are done differently, or simply seem not to work.

BUT - I had understood that AOL was quite highly regarded for their family-friendly nannying censorship, and accordingly might be a good recommendation for kids...

I'm not an advocate of relying on on-line support for internet access problems (think about it!)


Yes they do help to stop kiddie surfing, but download Opera or the like and you can I'm told bypass it. It really only uses the MS plugin service. If you want real kiddies safe NetNanny or SurfControl are the very best and issue updates daily.

judyofthewoods



Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Pembrokeshire
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I took a free trial with AOL when I first went onto the net 4 years ago, and did not like it, and when trying to cancel, I had a real difficult time getting through to them on the phone (the only way I could cancel), spending hours listening to menus and musac grrr, and then some real hard sales pap, allmost threats of suicide from the op if I didn't renew.....I'd run a mile from AOL, quite apart from all the other issues mentioned above.
I have tiscali, which is quite reasonable in price and quite reliable. I use a blank browser (MS IE), and pick my search engine from the favorites when needed, much quicker to load. Pitty though, that crappy MS has cornered the market, would rather not support them, but am not techy enough to go for alternatives .

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

judyofthewoods wrote:
am not techy enough to go for alternatives .




You don't have to be techy both Opera and firefox are very easy to set up and free (although the free version of opera displays ads).

jema
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 28237
Location: escaped from Swindon
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
judyofthewoods wrote:
am not techy enough to go for alternatives .




You don't have to be techy both Opera and firefox are very easy to set up and free (although the free version of opera displays ads).


Only thing i really dislike about Firefox is that I have no spotted how to make it fail with an error message when there is a JavaScript bug. This makes it a bit of a pain when developing JavaScript.

jema

mochyn



Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 24585
Location: mid-Wales
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

tahir wrote:
judyofthewoods wrote:
am not techy enough to go for alternatives .




You don't have to be techy both Opera and firefox are very easy to set up and free (although the free version of opera displays ads).


Totally lost me there, Judy! If you're not techy enough, I'm still pre-stone age! I've opened quite a can of worms, haven't I? I'm more confused thanever now! No idea what to go for!

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45674
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Don't worry, just sign up with BT and once you're up and running with that we'll get you onto a different browser.

sean
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 42219
Location: North Devon
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

My only problem with firefox is that Mandy keeps customising it when I'm not looking.

mochyn



Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 24585
Location: mid-Wales
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Tahir, you're a star. Meanwhile, I shall console myself with this peice of Chocolate Chestnut Truffle Cake

mochyn



Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 24585
Location: mid-Wales
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 05 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Just been on the BT ineternet site and, ironically, I can't get access to the relevant page! Never mind, I've asked them to send the info. to me. Fingers crossed.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> IT Matters All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com