|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Pilsbury
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 5645 Location: East london/Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 05 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
I know Solar Electric is Expensive.
But I'd like to know just *how* expensive it is.
There doesn't seem to be anything about costs on that website!
So, I followed Solarcentury's link to the Energy Saving Trust (grants) website where the first case study listed was this one:
https://www.est.org.uk/solar/downloads/casestudies/andrewfinnis_short.pdf
which is a Solarcentury installation.
The chap spent just short of �29k.
He got a grant that reduced his net outlay to �14,390
For that he has a very inconspicuous, utterly innocuous, and hopefully low maintainance, installation, hooked up to the grid (so no batteries, etc are included in that price), which generates - at peak - just 2.3kW.
Not quite enough to run a kettle.
This solar roof produces less than half of the power of Jerome's 15 foot diameter wind turbine
https://www.downsizer.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72
- although I'm sure the PV roof is much more acceptable in a residential neighbourhood! And remember that solar does nothing at night...
Based on 6p/unit of electricity, the PV roof is "estimated" to save �100 a year on his electricity bills.
The investment is yielding less than 0.7% per annum. (Albeit tax free.)
Personally, I doubt he has increased the value of his house by �28k, �14k or even �5k...
To me that looks like a prospective ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY FOUR YEARS before the system pays for itself (ignoring the cost of the money as well as inflation).
How can it possibly be that the �14k would NOT been better spent on insulation or other energy efficency improvements with a better **carbon** (and cash) saving?
A more reasonable example from the same list is the Norman's where �4,500 net bought them an annual saving estimated at �65. That's ONLY a seventy year payback! Their �4,500 bought them half the generating capacity needed for an electric kettle.
https://www.est.org.uk/solar/downloads/casestudies/pearl_peter_norman.pdf
IMHO, solar PV may have some role to play in entirely off-grid installations. Out in the wilds where there is no mains. But even there, it should only be a part of the plan.
This technology is EXPENSIVE. Why? Because it uses large amounts of Silicon cells, and although the raw material (sand!) is cheap, it is fantastically energy-intensive and chemically nasty (and thus expensive) to process into photocells.
A cheapish solar water heating installation should cost around �1500 net, one third of the Norman's price, and give the same sort of cash saving - with disproportionately higher carbon savings (daytime electricity is rarely used for water heating!) |
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
mrutty
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 1578
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28233 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Jonsey
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Chelmsford Essex
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Jonsey
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Chelmsford Essex
|
|
|
|
|
hardworkinghippy
Joined: 01 Jan 2005 Posts: 1110 Location: Bourrou South West France
|
|
|
|
|
Lloyd
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 2699
|
|
|
|
|
hardworkinghippy
Joined: 01 Jan 2005 Posts: 1110 Location: Bourrou South West France
|
|
|
|
|
nettie
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 5888 Location: Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Jonsey
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Chelmsford Essex
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
|