|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
TimNeo
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 636 Location: Ashingdon, UK
|
|
|
|
|
LynneA
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 4893 Location: London N21
|
|
|
|
|
TimNeo
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 636 Location: Ashingdon, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
TimNeo
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 636 Location: Ashingdon, UK
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Too
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 2511 Location: N.Ireland
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Boodle
Joined: 18 Sep 2006 Posts: 28 Location: The Shire of Spires and Squires
|
|
|
|
|
oddballdave
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 259 Location: Telford, Shropshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 06 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
Quote: |
Talking of plot size, I've been told the plot I'm looking at next week is 6 polls in size, what the hell dose that mean? |
From Wikipedia
A rod is a unit of length, equal to 11 cubits, 5.0292 metres or 16.5 feet. A rod is the same length as a perch[1] and a pole. The lengths of the perch (one rod) and chain (four rods) were standardized in 1607 by Edmund Gunter.
And from Kitchen Gardens
The size of an allotment is measured in poles and rent is paid per pole. A standard size plot of 9m x 27m (10 x 30 yd) is equivalent to 10 poles.
But the best explanation is:-
My allotment is nine poles. But how much is that then? And is it always the same? And why is it a pole?
The pole was the ox-goad the medieval ploughman used to control his team of eight oxen. In order to reach the leading pair he had to have a long pokey thing which had to be sixteen and a half feet or five and a half yards long.
This becomes particularly interesting when you think that each ploughman had a pretty standard measuring pole. A mediaeval ploughman with a team of eight oxen was required to till one acre a day. That was a furlong in length. Obviously a "furrowlong" was about the most four yoke of oxen could pull steadily through heavy soil before they had to rest � 220 yards.
An acre (4,840 square yards) is one furlong in length and one chain in breadth. A chain was 22 yards. OK but what�s that got to do with poles? Well it�s 22 yards � or four poles. Such a convenient length as the pole allowed easy assessment at any time in the day of how much had been ploughed of the width of the acre.
Interestingly the dividing markers between the acres were very narrow strips of unploughed land which, over the long years, as the land between them was worked and in consequence sank a little, appeared to be raised. When crop rotation allowed land to lie fallow, any games played on its rich grass would be dictated by those markers. So you might push some stumps in and throw balls at them, on a wicket 22 yards long. Gosh let�s call it cricket.
Looking down the furrow, to where the oxen turned and rested, one acre butted up to the next, and small mounds rose from the ground. They were called butts and were utilised, as butts are today, as protection for those who stood behind the archery targets. And how long was a furrow again? About 220 yards. A good distance to be deadly accurate with a longbow.
HTH
Dave
who has a 'full' plot which is more than enough work |
|
|
|
|
Sir Boodle
Joined: 18 Sep 2006 Posts: 28 Location: The Shire of Spires and Squires
|
|
|
|
|
oddballdave
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 259 Location: Telford, Shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
TimNeo
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 636 Location: Ashingdon, UK
|
|
|
|
|
LynneA
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Posts: 4893 Location: London N21
|
|
|
|
|
TimNeo
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 636 Location: Ashingdon, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|