|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42219 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45670 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
bagpuss
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 10507 Location: cambridge
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Peter
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 2400 Location: Milton Keynes
|
|
|
|
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42219 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45670 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
thos
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 1139 Location: Jauche, Duchy of Brabant (Bourgogne-ci) and Charolles, Duchy of Burgundy (Bourgogne-�a)
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 05 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
No swimming pool?
I did set me thinking though, about more than one family in a house. Very often these big places have at least some kind of annexe, or even seperate properties, but if you bought, say a big farmhouse, would it be economical to notionally split it into two semis? Does one big house with land cost less than two smaller houses with land? You'd need to get on - or would you? If you did the legal stuff and did divide it into two semis, people who live in them get on OK (mostly, anyway), as long as you did agree the splitting properly, and everyone had their own bit?
Sounds like an idea anyway! |
|
|
|
|
Deedee
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 250 Location: Surrey
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42219 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
|