|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Sky
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 7658 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 05 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
Viking_Chick wrote: |
I'm a newbie here but would like to add a bit to what has already been said.
Changing lifestyles does not happen overnight. If you believe in something, great, and if you can live up to the ideals that come with that belief, even better. But we are all just human at the end of the day, none of us perfect. Not even you real_eco with your presumably partly plastic computer.
Everyone here is doing what they do for their own reasons - some may claim to be environmentalists, some are doing it for other ethical reasons - such as an abhorrance of factory farming or a desire to reduce costs or a feeling that they want to get back to an older style of living. Whatever their reasons, it is *their* reasons and the rest of the site is to support the baby steps that each individual here is making towards their own, individual, goals.
And going back to my opening statement, life changes don't and for the vast majority of people, cannot happen overnight. None of us knows everything, but we are all making our way slowly, changing what we do bit by bit to make the changes we can in our own way.
It's not good enough for you, but its good enough for us. Personally I think people should be encouraged to do what they can as they can. Trying to make people feel bad about not doing enough soon enough is far more likely to make them give up on the goals that they have rather than encourage them to do more.
I prefer the downsizer.net approach. Friendly support in a way that does make you think about doing things that you never have before.
It works for me. |
Three cheers for Viking_chick then! It couldn't have been put any better IMO.
We are all here to help each other in our struggle towards a better life, no matter how long it may take. Those that come along and criticise this are not only not welcome but are hindering us in our process by wasting our valuable reading time.
However "GUEST" if you do return I am quite happy to discuss your comments further. PM me |
|
|
|
|
Viking_Chick
Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 123
|
|
|
|
|
tigerminxy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 11
|
|
|
|
|
judith
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Posts: 22789 Location: Montgomeryshire
|
|
|
|
|
maggiem
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 4 Location: France
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28234 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28234 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Joey
Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 05 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
If eco- whatisname was a real environmentalist he wouldn't be horrified by faeces and urine and realise that it's all part of the
nitrogen and carbon cycles.
He would also realise that because of climate and land types it is not viable to grow crops other than grass and forage so meat production is the best way to produce food in these areas.
He would also realise that more than half the other feed materials used to supplement ruminant diets or to feed pigs and poultry are byproducts of the human food production eg: flour, oils, alcohol, sugar and so perform a recyling role. In fact if you consider that a lot of the cereals (the other half of their diets)that are used to feed animals are grown in areas where it is not possible to produce high quality bread making wheats or malting barley, then again this crop growing for meat production is the best use of this land for food production. You should also be aware that there is more rapeseed meal becoming available in Europe for animal feed because of the increasing demand for oil for biodiesel. There is also more maize byproducts appearing in the USA because of ethanol production. Both replace fossil fuels.
Then again we could plant woodland on all of Britain. We could all starve, but then we could all have oak desks, and oak coffins.
Yes we need to be more environmentally conscious and rainforest shold not be destroyed for beef cattle. However, if you are going to
eat food and enjoy it there has to be a middle ground if there is to be food for everyone.
Oh, and next time you are sitting in Glastonbury Festival, eating lentil stew, check the lentils haven't been shipped halfway across the world! You could be enjoying a piece of prime Somerset beef and saving food miles in the process. |
|
|
|
|
nettie
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 5888 Location: Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
mochyn
Joined: 21 Dec 2004 Posts: 24585 Location: mid-Wales
|
|
|
|
|
mochyn
Joined: 21 Dec 2004 Posts: 24585 Location: mid-Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Joey
Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Posts: 191
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|