|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
James
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 2866 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
nettie
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 5888 Location: Suffolk
|
|
|
|
|
James
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 2866 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42219 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
Jb
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 7761 Location: 91� N
|
|
|
|
|
Slim
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 6612 Location: New England (In the US of A)
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 08 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
Slim wrote: |
well, it's not like it's pure nitrogen, right? There's a lot of other stuff there that should be getting introduced to the soil. Plus, any C that is getting pulled from the soil is being split: into the portion needed by the microbes metabolism and therefore lost as CO2, but also into humus that will hold whatever N benefit you're getting.
So I guess it's basically the same C into CO2 and humus process that's taking part in your composting, but you're doing it in your garden soil. Any reason to keep your soil C in coarse organic matter and not humus? |
All depends on how much C and N you've got in what you're diggin in really, and how quickly it degrades. The trouble with pressure cooked chicken waste is, I suspect, that you'll get very readily degraded N sources, and thats the limiting nutrient for a lot of soil bacteria so you'll now lose whatever most readily metabolised C you have to CO2, etc. Familiar story really. |
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46216 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
James
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 2866 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
James
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 2866 Location: York
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 08 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
"sparingly" is all a chicken carcass ends up being added as.
Once mashed up, you have about two pints of goo, and most of this is liquid. Spread this over a decent size bed and dig in and your talking about a sparing addition.
I take your point, however cab.
But whether you rot the carcass down in the compost heap or the soil, it will convert the same quantity of C into CO2- there will be a net loss of C from your system to the atmosphere no matter what, which will need to be replenished with another addition of C at some point. That's fine by me, because a normal healthy soil is constantly being improved with more C.
Perhaps I should have caviated my original statement by saying that the addition of chicken carcasses to ground should only be undertaken as part of a healthy, balanced soil diet. If you just relied on chicken carcasses to enrichen your soil, you'd soon have a very ill, C-deplete soil. |
|
|
|
|
Slim
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 6612 Location: New England (In the US of A)
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 08 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
Most organic folks like us, actually have more organic matter than we really need. That's not to say that it isn't worth striving for more - what soil problem can't be fixed with more organic matter? But do you really need a topsoil with 12% organic matter?
I wouldn't think that you'd be doing too much devastation, unless you were really adding a lot of nitrate in one go. I've always thought it was best to mix nitrogen with lots of carbon in a well oxygenated form, and hope to facilitate it's capture into humus, etc... If you let nitrogen sit, particularly in a low oxygen environment, it will just be quickly reduced to N2 gas and escape you.
nitrate is not only ridiculously soluble, it's the second best oxidizer for most any microorganism. If I can trap some portion of it in humus, it's worth the burning of some organic matter, in my book. |
|
|
|
|
jenjermima
Joined: 28 Aug 2009 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
|
|