Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Poll on moderator visibility
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Site guidelines, Announcements, Problems and Suggestions

How should the moderators be made more visible
1. List names at top of forum index
5%
 5%  [ 5 ]
2. Mark next to avatar to indicate a moderator
26%
 26%  [ 25 ]
3. Both options 1 and 2
34%
 34%  [ 33 ]
4. Don't care/leave it how it is currently
33%
 33%  [ 32 ]
Total Votes : 95

Author 
 Message
bagpuss



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 10507
Location: cambridge
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 10 11:55 am    Post subject: Poll on moderator visibility Reply with quote
    

Here is the poll on moderator visibility.

If you wish to discuss your options before voting or just read other people's opinions please do so in here

This thread is purely for voting purposes

cab



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 10 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

After a whole day of consulting on this, you should have done better than lumping the abstain option with the 'do nothing' option, the two being clearly different.

bagpuss



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 10507
Location: cambridge
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 10 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Bump

OP



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 4661
Location: Yorkshire
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 10 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I have voted, I will let you guess what for!

wellington womble



Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Posts: 15051
Location: East Midlands
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 10 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cab wrote:
After a whole day of consulting on this, you should have done better than lumping the abstain option with the 'do nothing' option, the two being clearly different.


They would both result in no action taken, so it seemed sensible to put them together.

cab



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Thats like counting spoiled ballots in an election as counting for the existing party. The say 'I don't care' is not the same as saying 'I want no change'.

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Option 4 makes sense to me, especially as those voting for the alternatives expect the volunteer technical people on this site to make the necessary changes.

Perhaps in future people carrying out this kind of work could be paid by downsizer funds?

If I was voting for changes I would have voted for just a list at the top, which wasn't available as an option.

bagpuss



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 10507
Location: cambridge
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Jonnyboy wrote:

If I was voting for changes I would have voted for just a list at the top, which wasn't available as an option.


Isn't that what option 1 was?

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 11:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Yes, I am an idiot.

bagpuss



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 10507
Location: cambridge
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Jonnyboy wrote:
Yes, I am an idiot.


We can probably manage to -1 from 4 and +1 to 1 so it works out okay

Jonnyboy



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

No, I didn't intend to vote that way so it's fine. I just didn't read the poll options properly. Don't change your figures.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

cab wrote:
Thats like counting spoiled ballots in an election as counting for the existing party. The say 'I don't care' is not the same as saying 'I want no change'.


I see your point, but the people have who voted for that option must not care and not want change. It should have been worded better according to the action to be taken, rather than the feelings around that action as opposed to splitting the option.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rob R wrote:


I see your point, but the people have who voted for that option must not care and not want change. It should have been worded better according to the action to be taken, rather than the feelings around that action as opposed to splitting the option.


Wont the "I dont care's" just not bother voting?

cab



Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Rob R wrote:


I see your point, but the people have who voted for that option must not care and not want change. It should have been worded better according to the action to be taken, rather than the feelings around that action as opposed to splitting the option.


Wont the "I dont care's" just not bother voting?


Several posted to the discussion on this to say 'I don't care', and clicking a box is even less effort than that...

bagpuss



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 10507
Location: cambridge
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 10 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

This poll will close at lunchtime tomorrow

please vote

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Site guidelines, Announcements, Problems and Suggestions All times are GMT
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com