|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 07 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
tigerseye402 (as someone who lives in the U.S.) wrote: |
I think I'd probably be more likely to be struck by lightning going outside to take care of the chickens than to catch bird flu from them.
Still, just wondering. |
OK, lets look at some figures.
USA 756 lightning deaths 1990/2003.
Call that 60/year for 300 million population.
Or 1 person/year out of 5 million.
Official figures for human deaths from bird flu are less than 300 in 3 years worldwide.
World population is about 6,600 million.
So thats about 1 person/year out of 66 million worldwide.
Not much chance right now.
You are more than 13x more likely to be struck by lightning...
However there is quite a bit of regional variation.
In Wyoming, the risk of being killed by lightning rises to 1 person/year out of only half a million...
And in the entire USA no one has detected, let alone died from, H5N1 bird flu.
So in Wyoming there's a significant risk from lightning, and so far, zero risk from bird flu.
This is a disease that today poses a threat to birds, not people.
And not yet even to birds in the USA.
Public health authorities are however rightly concerned that, sometime in the future, somewhere in the world, the H5N1 bird virus might develop the trick of infecting people as easily as it today infects and spreads among birds. The authorities are concerned that the new version might then sweep the world - but IF it developed the new trick, THEN the risk would be of catching the new H5N1 from people, not from birds.
Lightning statistics here: https://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_lls/fatalities_us.html |
|
|
|
|
tigerseye
Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 2 Location: New York
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46207 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|