|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Wombat
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 396 Location: SW Cheshire
|
|
|
|
|
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23956 Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
anneka
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 158
|
|
|
|
|
Gervase
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 8655
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
Lloyd
Joined: 24 Jan 2005 Posts: 2699
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 05 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
Cab wrote: |
judyofthewoods wrote: |
All but a vegan would be in a position to criticise anyone for shooting for food. |
A vegan has to eat food that takes up farming space, which necessitates that less land is available for other wild species of plant and animal. In effect, a vegan is as indirectly responsible for animal death as anyone else. |
The vegan argument goes that less land is necessary to feed people on vegetable protein than is needed for livestock farming, but you are right, whatever we eat, we are responsible for death, its the way of nature. The bottom line is not to eat and consume* excessively, do it as ethically as we can, keep our own numbers down, and there will be enough to go around for everyone and everything, i.e. not just humans.
*by consume I mean as in use of resources, which all destroys habitat through direct depleteon (mining, quarrying, logging, farming, distribution network) and poisoning. |
|
|
|
|
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23956 Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
McLay455
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 89 Location: West of Scotland
|
|
|
|
|
DarrenG
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 110 Location: Lincolnshire Fens
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
|