Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
DIY CHP
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects
Author 
 Message
vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:

Some people that run old listers do recover the heat but the primary use was the power & the heat was being lost.


The only times I've seen this work well is when they are running on waste oil (veg or mineral motor oil) and where they needed power over extended periods (10 hrs per day lighting chicken sheds is one example).

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Even with dedicated designed for the job equipment its still marginal. Thats why there still is no viable affordable system on the market yet.

The thing about dedicated designed for the job equipment is that it is expensive to make, and it still wears out.
That would make it very difficult to make a marketable system.
Quote:
Our genny produced elec costs about 50p per kwh

What are you running it on?

Lorrainelovesplants



Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 6521
Location: Dordogne
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I think you have to look at why you are burning so much gas, what your house insulation is like, your state of dress as you walk round the house, and what alternatives you have.

Our LPG bill was �2500 per year, and that was for hot water and CH (we have no access to mains gas).

We have reduced this now to �600 per year (same house). We still have the LPG (its for baths, really cold snaps and early morning heat only)

We installed a new woodburner with back boiler and this does our Living room heat, radiators in the 3 beds and bathroom down the hall, and gives me hot water in the evening to do the dishes (3rd tap on sink).

Our wood is nearly free.......we use 5 tons a year, this keps us toastie warm. We had cavity wall insulation in the whole house for les than �100 (grant aided), and have heavy curtains on the one draughty door, and wear jumpers and socks (as well as usual cothes)round the house.

We'll recoup the cost of the new woodburner in less than 2 years.
I'd rather spend the money on other things.

vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

As Richard W as said you're going to get a lot more heat energy than electrical output. Balancing one against the other and still maintaining some sort of economy is very difficult and is one of the reason household CHP devices have failed in the market place.

Behemoth



Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 19023
Location: Leeds
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

British Gas are just about to introduce a domestic CHP boiler. What that means I don't know but they think there is a market there, for the boilers at least.

Last edited by Behemoth on Wed Oct 28, 09 3:35 pm; edited 1 time in total

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Lorrainelovesplants wrote:
I think you have to look at why you are burning so much gas...

A valid thought, but no.
Once I saw the speed the meter was spinning at I turned it off.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Hairyloon wrote:

What are you running it on?


Red. Read all 57 pages of THIS THREAD & you will understand why (plus you will learn lots about CHP)

If fully loaded to its max out put its cheaper but most of the time you dont have the genny maxed out & the 50p per kwh is the average of all our consumption via the genny.

Behemoth wrote:
British Gas are just about to introduce a domestic CHP boiler. What that means I don't know but they think there is a market there, for the boilers at least.


If I remember right thats the same one the 3 other large elec suppliers have been dabbling with for a few years with promises of it hitting the market some time soon. If so the quoted cost was (please sit down) over �20k. From what the off grid community is saying its just a way that the big suppliers can say they are trying to be greener by supporting this company but the pubic wont buy it.

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 09 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Hairyloon wrote:

What are you running it on?

Red. Read all 57 pages of THIS THREAD & you will understand why (plus you will learn lots about CHP)

I'll have to come back to that later.
Quote:
If fully loaded to its max out put its cheaper but most of the time you dont have the genny maxed out & the 50p per kwh is the average of all our consumption via the genny.

How much is red these days?
From what I can find, diesel has an energy content of 38-40MJ/l.
A kWh is 3.6MJ, so the equivalent gas energy to a litre of diesel would be about 40p.
A bit cheaper I think, but not that much.
What's your peak efficiency with the genny at max?

Tom Booth



Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 25 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Hairyloon wrote:

...
It would be better with a Stirling engine,...


Curious if this project ever went anywhere.

I found this solar Stirling engine for sale on eBay.




Some military surplus or something apparently. I have yet to figure out if it actually still works or not.

It came out of one of these, or rather, I think it never was installed.

https://youtu.be/EBidoWN-9Us?si=wvZE6cNbteFAumyx

tahir



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45685
Location: Essex
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 25 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Wow, that's a lovely thing! Not sure it ever did.

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 16027

PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 25 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Might be useful if it did.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46269
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 25 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

very nicely made

it seems to have lots of wires, does it make leccy as well as turn a wheel?
maybe the wires are control sensor links, they look thin for power output?

if it does not work it should be fairly easy to get it working as it looks "new" and un-degraded by time etc
be careful with precision engineering

it seems chunky so it might produce a decent amount of usable energy from enough low grade heat, be that solar or other source, to give the right temp at the hot side

Tom Booth



Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 25 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

dpack wrote:
very nicely made

it seems to have lots of wires, does it make leccy as well as turn a wheel?
maybe the wires are control sensor links, they look thin for power output?


The bunch of thin wires are thermocouples.

Quote:
if it does not work it should be fairly easy to get it working as it looks "new" and un-degraded by time etc
be careful with precision engineering

it seems chunky so it might produce a decent amount of usable energy from enough low grade heat, be that solar or other source, to give the right temp at the hot side


It's intended use was for concentrated solar, as in the video. Very high temperature concentrated solar using a large parabolic dish (about 15 foot diameter or 160 square feet). The receptor area is only about the size of a baseball, so the input heat needs to be very concentrated and VERY hot about 800 suns, (potentially up to 3600°Fahrenheit)

I originally got it thinking I might run it on the top of my wood stove but so far I haven't been able to get the hot end up to "operating temperature" (minimum about 1200°F) by any normal heating appliance. Like an electric stove top burner on high.

The problem is, It needs a water cooling system running to keep the electronics cool so a lot of heat goes into the cooling system. So, I've managed so far to make a lot of hot water, but that is about all

Maybe not really a very practical design for a CHP system, though it was tested for that by the army, but strangely, once running, the heat is converted to electricity 3000 watts, and that keeps the engine running relatively cool, so it did not produce enough hot water.

It is difficult to find any documentation, so what information I have comes from old published online news or magazine articles. This one in particular is pretty informative:

https://www.machinedesign.com/markets/energy/article/21831691/infinia-uses-stirling-cycle-for-solar-power-and-air-conditioning

The production of these was going to be funded by some government fund to help bail out the auto industry. The funding was going to pay the auto makers to build these solar Stirling engines instead of car engines.

But then, suddenly the program to bail out the auto makers was canceled and the company making the Stirling engines declared bankruptcy. The existing engines already produced were sold as scrap and the operating instructions withheld.

Now the engines are being used to run compressors to open and close valves on gas pipelines in remote locations.

The engines can run 25 years without maintenance.

https://youtu.be/2Yzeo4JrsNs

So, without the mass production that could have been provided through the established auto industry the cost of production is higher than it might have been.

The engine I have, that you see in the photo was a production model that was sent to a university in Denver Colorado, I believe, for evaluation and testing, then it went into storage and was forgotten, apparently.

From what I've been able to find out, which isn't much, all the others that were produced were destroyed, sold as scrap metal.

I'm rather astonished that with the intended high heat input, this engine only requires a rather ordinary automotive type cooling system. I have to assume, once up and running, the conversion rater, heat to electricity is very high.

The above video is just clips I took from some other much longer interviews. Links are also in the description:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CoC_n-BYPJ4&t=0s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y557uXBRkVg&t=0s

If the funding had not been pulled and these had gone into mass production, I imagine the cost of these engines would be way down by now. They are actually, in many ways, much much simpler than any automobile engine and can run for decades with zero maintenance.

It appears that the one I have was never used, just tested at a university. So it should have 20 years or more life left, if I can get it running

It is supposed to be self starting if it can be gotten hot enough.

I think a direct gas flame might do it, as these were originally used with propane and are now still being used on gas pipelines.

Tom Booth



Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 25 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Some of the off grid remote sites where these engines are currently operating unattended:

From the Qenergy website:

https://qnergy.com/image-gallery/

Tom Booth



Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 25 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

https://youtu.be/QH8RBcyFDe4?si=lBK8oL4gZ9AH_V_e

It says in this video that the special Flexure springs are patented, but that is a bit misleading. Such springs are nothing new and there are dozens of variations. The engine I have was developed using taxpayer funds as part of a government program so cannot be patented by law.

Qenergy, I suppose, developed a slightly different style spring so they could claim a patent but the basic Stirling Engine technology goes back to the 1800's

Probably it is obvious it infuriates me that these engines could have been available and mass produced back around 2009 when the one I have came off the production line but now we still have to buy the gas and oil while these engines are only used on gas and oil pipelines!!!

I don't think the government program that spent hundreds of millions of dollars developing these engines was intended to simply further enrich the Oil and Gas companies.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright � 2004 marsjupiter.com